[Developers] Re: [Patches] Correct definition of CCTK_RESTRICT
goodale at cct.lsu.edu
Tue Dec 13 09:54:08 CST 2005
I've applied the change to the header file. I've nor forced people to
reconfigure, 'though, as that would force a complete rebuild, which is not
necessary apart from for getting a gain in performance, which may well be
offset by the time taken to recompile, or pointless if they are
developing. Of course people doing production runs should reconfigure to
get the performance benefits of restrict for c99 compilers.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> Correct the definition of CCTK_RESTRICT in cctk_Config.h.in. When
> CCTK_*_RESTRICT is not defined, that means that the keyword "restrict" works
> fine as is, and therefore CCTK_RESTRICT should be defined to "restrict", not
> to be empty.
> Update force-reconfigure so that people benefit immediately from that change.
More information about the Developers