[Developers] [Patches] Make ADMConstraints GF public
steve.white at aei.mpg.de
Wed Sep 6 08:58:01 CDT 2006
It was a fresh checkout, with the development version of Carpet.
As to the reliability of the system...please provide criteria by which
I can judge this.
Did you run all the testsuites using the ThornList and config file I
I found my results unremarkable. This is what I have been seeing for
months, on various systems, and it is what I have been reporting.
One thought is that some combination of thorns causes some interferance
in the test suites.
I'll try it all again when I get back.
On 31.08.06, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> Was it a checkout from scratch?
> Did you get the development version of Cactus?
> Did you run it on a reliable system?
> Did you check the log files for the catastrophic failures? For
> example, one of the test cases reports in your output:
> Test ADMConstraints: ADMConstraints_Physical
> "Constraints for Schwarzschild with physical metric"
> Issuing mpirun -np 1 /home/swhite/Cactus/builds/Frank/exe/
> cactus_all /home/swhite/Cactus/builds/Frank/arrangements/
> No files created in test directory
> Failure: 40 files compared, 40 differ, 40 differ significantly
> It would be interesting to see why this run did not produce any
> output. I suspect a grave problem unrelated to the test case.
> On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:05:12, Steve White wrote:
> >My checkout is from yesterday.
> >Find attached my ThornList and Cactus config file.
> >This is Intel 9.1 on my T41p.
> >On 31.08.06, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> >>On Aug 31, 2006, at 07:26:58, Steve White wrote:
> >>>I tried running the testsuites before and after applying the patch.
> >>>I compiled in all the distro thorns I could (-= SDF, PETC, LAPACK
> >>>Find attached the results.
> >>>With and without Franks patch 34 tests and 34 fail.
> >>>Unfortunately the results are slightly different.
> >>>On the other hand, there are just more error messages
> >>>before the patch than after.
> >>>This test seems to fail in somewhat different ways in the two cases
> >>> test_ADM_4
> >>>I'm kind of in a rush, so it's hard for me to judge.
> >>>What's the call?
> >>I get very different test suite results without this patch. For
> >>example, all the ADMConstraints test cases succeed for me. This is
> >>from today's nightly build test, which checks out Cactus freshly from
> >Steve White : Programmer
> >Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-
> >Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Golm, Germany
> >Developers mailing list
> >Developers at cactuscode.org
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at cactuscode.org
Steve White : Programmer
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut
Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Golm, Germany +49-331-567-7625
More information about the Developers