[Developers] MoL Scheduling

I.Hawke i.hawke at soton.ac.uk
Fri Sep 7 09:52:11 CDT 2007

Tom Goodale wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, I.Hawke wrote:
> Scheduling statements are only considered relative to things within the 
> same schedule group/bin, i.e. in your example above you have to explicitly 
> schedule C in A --- without that the scheduler just looks in the current 
> group, sees there is no B there and ignores the AFTER.

Ok, that means it is an error; I have committed a fix.


More information about the Developers mailing list