[Developers] MoL Scheduling
i.hawke at soton.ac.uk
Fri Sep 7 09:52:11 CDT 2007
Tom Goodale wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, I.Hawke wrote:
> Scheduling statements are only considered relative to things within the
> same schedule group/bin, i.e. in your example above you have to explicitly
> schedule C in A --- without that the scheduler just looks in the current
> group, sees there is no B there and ignores the AFTER.
Ok, that means it is an error; I have committed a fix.
More information about the Developers