[Developers] [Flesh-cvs] DEVELOPMENT CVS "Cactus/lib/make/known-architectures aix6.1.2.0"

[Erik Schnetter]

David

You are probably right.  We could have if statements in the files for  
changes that may be necessary for major OS releases.

-erik

On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:45:31, David Rideout wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have always wondered something about known-architectures:  Isn't  
> it possible
> to omit the version number from the file name?  Otherwise one must  
> commit a
> new file for each new version of the OS, which seems not terribly
> maintainable.  Many of these files are identical.
> Is the idea that this is a better way to support old versions
> of an OS?  But wouldn't it be better to edit a single known- 
> architectures
> file, based upon details of various versions, than to keep  
> committing new
> files?
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>
>> Update of /cactusdevcvs/Cactus/lib/make/known-architectures
>> In directory asylum.cct.lsu.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv2578
>>
>> Added Files:
>> 	aix6.1.2.0
>> Log Message:
>> Add support for AIX 6.1.2.0
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flesh-cvs mailing list
>> Flesh-cvs at cactuscode.org
>> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/flesh-cvs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/developers


-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>   http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/

My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from <http://pgp.mit.edu>.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090721/4ac1f5ab/attachment.bin