[Developers] [trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org: [ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #108: LocalInterp and LocalReduce should move to CactusNumerical]

Frank Loeffler knarf at cct.lsu.edu
Wed Dec 8 08:12:27 CST 2010


Hi,

are there objections against moving LocalInterp and LocalReduce to
CactusNumerical? They are currently in CactusBase.

Frank

----- Forwarded message from Einstein Toolkit <trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org> -----

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:12:25 -0000
From: Einstein Toolkit <trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org>
Cc: trac at einsteintoolkit.org
Subject: [ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #108: LocalInterp and LocalReduce
	should move to CactusNumerical
Reply-To: users at einsteintoolkit.org
List-Id: trac changes <trac.einsteintoolkit.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

#108: LocalInterp and LocalReduce should move to CactusNumerical
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  anonymous  |        Type:  enhancement
   Status:  new        |    Priority:  minor      
Milestone:             |   Component:  Cactus     
  Version:             |    Keywords:             
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------


-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/108>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
Trac at einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/trac

----- End forwarded message -----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20101208/62b0f8c6/attachment.bin 


More information about the Developers mailing list